I just had one of those moments where several things that I’ve
known about for years, and never considered to be all that linked, came
together in and meshed in my mind in the form of some sort of “well DUUUUH!”
type epiphany.
We all know that a good portion of the anti-gun celebrities
have body guards that carry guns to protect them. Loudly anti-gun folks, like Mark Cuban, and
Rosie O’Donnell have gone on record saying that it is okay for them to have
guns, because they are a celebrity and need them to protect themselves, but
that us hoi-polloi shouldn’t have them, because, I guess, we don’t need to
protect ourselves. Or something. So, we’re okay with using guns to protect our
celebrities.
We also know that anti-gun people are generally okay with
armored car drivers and mall security being armed. So, we’re okay with using guns to protect our
money and our shopping centers.
We also know that anti-gun people are fine with using guns
to protect politicians, since I’ve never seen an anti-secret service protest
from them. So, we’re okay with using
guns to protect our politicians.
This is where I went off the rails, because anti-gunners are
totally okay with using guns to protect money, celebrities, and politicians,
but when someone suggests that we use guns to protect our children, they
fucking shit a kitten.
Dude, you don't even want to know where I've been... Rosie... O'Donnell... |
I guess it goes to show you where the priorities of the
anti-gun crowd really are.
No comments:
Post a Comment