I watched “The Enemy at the Gates” again over the
weekend. As I watched it, amongst all
the other horrifying things that the reality of the Battle of Stalingrad made
evident, I was stricken by two things:
First, the absolute certainty that Hollywood labors under the
assumption that as long as they give an actor an English, or vaguely Scottish,
accent, we’ll accept that they are a foreigner.
It doesn’t matter that these are supposed to be Russians. They all have English accents. When they say “glass” they pronounce it “gloss”
like a Brit. It’s stupid. It also bothered the hell out of me when
Leonidas in the movie “The 300” spoke like a Scotsman through the entire
movie. Also stupid.
But more importantly, there is a scene at the end where the
main character’s friend, who is a political officer in the Red Army, sacrifices
himself out of desperation and grief when he realizes that the grand experiment
of communism has failed, and will always fail, because it is absolutely
impossible to make men equal, no matter how hard one tries.
There will always, always be “haves” and “have-nots”, he
realized, and it caused him to despair so much that he allows himself to be
killed by the Germans.
Some men will be more desirable to women, and therefore will
be luckier in love.
Some men will be physically stronger, more healthy, and more
handsome than other men, and so will be lucky genetically.
Some men will be smarter than other men, and so will be
lucky intellectually.
There can be no equality. As soon as you achieve parity on
one front, the inequality on others will become more glaring, and the effort
will simply shift focus; and at that point, where does it stop?
Forcing women to have sex with men that they don’t want to
have sex with, so that there is equality in sexual opportunity?
Surgically altering handsome or strong men to be less
handsome or strong?
Poisoning the healthy so they do not have a health advantage
over the sickly?
Of course, not, because that’s just ridiculous, right?
So why is it any less ridiculous to attempt to make men
equal economically? Is it so hard to
accept that, the same way that some men are gifted in physical strength, or in
sexual attractiveness, or in intellectual power, that men will likewise be
gifted economically? That they’ve got
some inherent ability to be particularly shrewd and intelligent in business
dealings, and so become wealthy? Given
that, isn’t it obvious that the flip side is that some men will be economically
incompetent, just as some others are ugly, and weak, and dumb?
I’ve come to the honest conclusion that if you were somehow
able to even the score, right here and right now, and redistribute every penny
of money in private hands in America today so that every man had the exact same
balance in their bank accounts, that in a matter of no time at all, the same
men who have the money now would have it again, and the men who are penniless
now would be penniless in spite of your best efforts. My guess is that in <5 years it’d be back
to the way it is right now, with a few exceptions for old money do-nothings and
some middle class guys that would be rich if they’d found their opportunity,
but just haven’t yet.
So at what point in time do we accept that efforts to
redistribute wealth are just a waste of time?
In light of all of his other abject failures, Obama is now
hammering the “wealth gap” and “inequality” in America as if that’s something
that is bad, and something that has to be fixed right now, and something that
he could, indeed, fix if he was only given the chance. Through the whole thing, I think of how many
times I’ve heard this same tired old saw in my short lifetime, and how men
older than me must be growing oh so weary of hearing it, becaue at 34 years
old, I’m sick to death of it. I also
think of how intellectually small a man like Obama has to be, in order to think
that there is anything that can be done, or rather, SHOULD BE done, to change
this thing that they’ve labeled a “problem.”
Some Congresscritters have gone on record, telling me that in writing
the things that I’ve written here, I am railing against my own self-interest,
because I would be a beneficiary in the reduction of the wealth gap. They’ve
gone so far as to insinuate that I’m stupid to NOT want these redistributions,
because it would mean that my healthcare would be free and my bank account
larger.
On that point, they are correct. I probably would greatly benefit from a
re-distirbution of wealth, if such a thing could be pulled off without them fucking
it up royally first (which is, as you know, a pre-requisite that I don’t think
they’ve yet met). However, I would also benefit from getting
away with robbing a bank, but I see plainly how morally wrong that is, and how
unsustainable it is, and how stupid it would be to attempt to make that my
philosophy; and yet I’m supposed to accept that these men, who cannot see all
of those things that are so clear to me, are my intellectual betters – my leaders,
as it were. I simply cannot accept
that.
No one is responsible for you but YOU. Forcing people to make things “Fair” by asking
the government to artificially level the field is nothing more than a great way
to be sure that they irreparably fuck things up. Suck it up, buttercup. If you want to earn my contempt, then you
should start complaining about how someone else should fix something for
you. If you want to succeed, my approval
be damned, fix it for your own damn self.
Agreed with all the points made.
ReplyDeleteI suspect that the Demoncats sudden harping or reemergence of the wealth gap or disparity in income is going to be the last issue they can try to hammer on since they've gotten their collective asses kicked on everything else they claimed would pan out and has not.
The issue will never go away however because its one that they can't solve and they know it so it will always appeal to the lowest common denominator of society out there.
And that denominator is always going to want someone to fix it for them, or someone to lead them out of the darkness or poverty or violence or any other number of things. They don't want to lead, they want someone to come in and lead them to easier pastures. These are also the same people that simply can not grasp that life is not fair. That like you stated Goober, that some thing can always be changed to make things more fair.
As a result instead of success and hard work being celebrated its not fair or you did not do that, you did not build that yourself. No one could possibly do that on their own because I could not do it/think of it/make it happen.
So instead of someone looking at what they can change about their situation or skill sets we end up with people that are enabled to quit instead of driven to try to succeed.