Elliot was a coward. He
was a pathetic excuse for a man. He had
reasonably good looks, money, and came from a somewhat well-known family, and
was still a virgin at 20 something, despite his best efforts. His failure was that of a man too solipsistic
to recognize that other people are more than just actors in his own personal
drama. He couldn’t understand why people
didn’t like him, because he had no concept of what it meant to be
likeable.
Like so many other things in life, getting people to do
things for you, and act in the way that you want them to act is more often an exercise
in changing YOURSELF than it is manipulating those around you. If you want to be valued, be valuable. If you want to be liked, be likeable. If you want to get fucked, be fuckable.
Feminists claim that PUAs drove him insane. PUAs claim that his lack of “game” drove him
insane.
My guess is that his insanity is what drove him insane. There was something wrong in his head, that
kept him from recognizing that very simple truth. But I also blame the lies told to us by
feminism to a large extent. If his
insanity was pre-existing, his inability to reconcile between the lies he was
told as to how things are, and the actual reality of things was certainly a
trigger.
It was the cognitive dissonance created in his head when he
lived exactly the life that feminists wanted him to live – that of an
emasculated, wussified, compliant white knight “nice guy” – and was rejected by
women right and left because what feminism says women want, and what they
actually WANT, are two different things.
He could not wrap his diseased little brain around the fact
that feminism is a lie, and always will be a lie, and that women who buy into
the feminist line are lying to themselves as much as they are lying to
anyone.
A woman who is not a lesbian will want to have a
relationship with a man. The
things that describe Elliot:
Solipsistic, selfish, weak, emasculated, whiney, compliant, groveling,
bitter… the list goes on and on, but the point is that these things, which
describe Elliot as a person?
None of those things fall within the definition of a
man.
I don’t subscribe to the red pill/blue pill comparison that
many men’s rights advocates use, mainly because by their definition I’ve always
been red pill, and never understood how a person could so fully believe the
lies that they are told daily that it defines their entire reality, but people
like Elliot make me think that maybe they are on to something. Elliot lived the
very definition of the blue pill life. He
allowed people to lie to him, and he believed those lies. He was unwilling to see the truth through
those lies, and as soon as the truth of reality had deviated so far from the
lies that he thought defined reality that he could no longer explain it away,
his entire view of the world fell down around him.
Feminism told him what women want, and it was a lie. When following that direction failed
demonstrably, and the people acting in exactly the opposite manner were achieving
the result that he sought, instead of looking inward and discovering that he’d
been lied to, he lashed out because “people weren’t acting the way they were
supposed to.” As if such a thing could
ever exist. People are people. They act how they want to, not how they’re “supposed
to.” Always have. Welcome to Earth,
motherfucker.
Red pill/blue pill, indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment